Report from the Bars, Barriers, or Justice Expo in West Chester, PA

By Brenda . . .

On Saturday, October 31, RSOL set up a booth at the Expo along with a number of other agencies. Most were state groups, or state chapters of national organizations such as Amnesty International and the Prison Society. The Expo was hosted by DeafCAN (Community Action Network) PA, but was not exclusively focused on the Deaf Community. Plenty of people from that community were present, however, and it was certainly an eye-opening experience for us, and for other national groups. We were invited to attend this event because a high percentage of deaf persons currently in prisons are there for a sexual offense.

With me at the booth were John and Sheri Tynes (member and board member of RSOL respectively) who drove all the way from Ohio to assist. John put together a nice self-playing powerpoint which we had running non-stop at the booth, and we also played a YouTube video – a very multimedia experience! Richard Earl from New Hampshire also drove down to join us for the day. His special focus was on connecting with any RSOL members who wanted to come and talk to us as long as we were in the area. He did connect with several folks while there.

Our main goal at the conference was to educate the wider criminal justice reform community about our particular issue, especially regarding the broad brush applied to registrants and the many difficulties faced by registrants and their families. And of course we also discussed constitutional and civil rights violations. My panel presentation specifically laid out our Assertions.

The bulk of the organizations and attendees were focused on ending mass incarceration, on improving prison conditions in general, and on ending the death penalty and life sentences.  Interwoven throughout were stories of the extreme difficulties faced by persons with disabilities. Many of us have heard that we incarcerate far too many people with mental illness who would do much better getting treatment and management within their communities. What we hear less about is the unique problems faced by persons with disabilities who enter the justice system.

As a quick introduction, we learned that police get very little training in dealing with a deaf person. Say someone is pulled over for a traffic violation. He wants to get the officer’s attention to try to show or explain something. You or I would say “excuse me?” but a deaf person taps you on the shoulder or arm. That is Assault. Then you are put into handcuffs. Your hands are what you use to speak! You cannot make a phone call because there is no special phone available. Even if you scribble a number down the officer may just dial it for you and walk away and you are unable to communicate. Writing notes back and forth is not the same, because English really isn’t your native language – Sign is.

In prison you are picked on, your requests for help laughed at, and you are totally isolated because nobody speaks Sign… nor would anyone be allowed to learn because the guards can’t have secret communication going on around them. You again are unable to call home, or if you do the already very expensive call is made more so by the fact that you must type back and forth, with no extra time for that. You can end up in Solitary because you don’t stand for Count… because you cannot HEAR the call to stand up for Count.

As far as RSOL’s efforts, we spoke to a number of other groups about our issue, and hopefully made some connections. My personal hope in attending meetings with other justice reform advocates is two-fold: first is to make sure they are aware of the myths and realities surrounding registered citizens, and second is to do my darnedest to make sure that former sexual offenders are not LEFT OUT of reform efforts.

This seems like a very modest goal, but the potential is huge when you think about it. We all know that the “sex offender” issue is a very toxic one. If you have not been personally impacted, you would probably still be thinking that anyone on a registry “deserved” it, is highly dangerous and you have every right to know who they are.  So the educational angle is absolutely critical. Other criminal justice groups need to understand the TRUTH or they will understandably shy away from including former sexual offenders in their reform efforts.

What I am telling these new potential allies, or will when I get the chance, is that we are looking for a seat at the table; an opportunity to help out behind the scenes; and for any reform they put forward, that they NOT EXCLUDE former sexual offenders.  We do not need to be out in front screaming about equal rights. Such noise would almost certainly kill any effort they are putting forward. But we can quietly help behind the scenes as they push for Equal Opportunities for ALL convicted persons.

Our presence at this Expo is I hope the first of many such opportunities to join forces with the larger criminal justice community. Keep an eye open for such opportunities in YOUR state, and we will do what we can to assist.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

Brenda Jones

Brenda is NARSOL's executive director. She is also the layout editor for the Digest, serves as affiliate coordinator for our affiliates, contacts, and advocates, and oversees special projects such as Fearless, the state WIKI, and Humans on the Registry.

  • This topic has 4 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 years ago by AvatarPaul.
Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #10860 Reply
      Avatar
      Paul

      I can imagine multiple disability populations are completely misunderstood by law enforcement. In fact I know of several of encounters that have ended up tragically because the police were not trained to understand how to approach and apprehend someone with a particular disability. And imprisonment might as well be a death chamber to certain folks with disabilities, such as the deaf, intellectually impaired and developmentally disabled including those with autism. And then when these folks get out, what do they have to look forward to? The registry! And if someone with an intellectual impairment lacks the cognitive wherewithal to understand every rule they have to abide by (the registry itself is like our tax code) they are charged with another felony. It’s a wonderful country we live in.

      But kudos to Brenda and RSOL for tackling this. Believe me, this is a very neglected area that even advocates of registrants don’t pay enough attention to. I’m glad RSOL does.

    • #10861 Reply
      Avatar
      Edward

      Of all of us on the registries, untold numbers of us are still on “Supervised Release” i.e. which basically means we are all of us in Dred Scott’s shoes. We are like field N-words in the antebellum south caught out of the fields in the middle of the day and knocking on the Big House front door. The house N-word then calls the overseer. We have no rights any law enforcement goon is bound to respect. And this condition is nominally for LIFE! Life, indeed….WHAT life!?

    • #10862 Reply
      Avatar
      Paul

      I would take what you’re saying (Edward) a step further and say that sex offender Supervised Release has given the government almost omnipotent power over an individual. No other type of probation or parole is more intrusive, not even for second degree murderers. While some oversight is expected and warranted for any type of supervision, this supervision goes beyond the pale for sex offenders, whether we are talking about twice a month or weekly visits, coercive group therapy where systematic pressure is employed by other members to have people confess sins which don’t exist, 30 days notice on travel (whereas it is 14 days for other felons) denials for travel because other federal districts can just say “no” and give no reason, unscientific polygraphing, etc. The containment model views sex offenders as as a “contagion” so no wonder you feel like a slave, Edward, you are being contained so you don’t contaminate the community. I’m not against supervision, I’m just in favor of supervision which does enough necessary to protect the public, not the kind of supervision which is oppressive to the point of enslavement.

    • #10863 Reply
      Avatar
      Paul

      By the way, judges are liberally imposing lifetime terms of Supervised Release these days for sex offenders. Presentence reports will recommend lifetime supervision in many of these cases. If someone needs lifetime supervision, what’s the logic in letting them out of prison to begin with? It’s absurd. I can imagine young Tommy the probation officer visiting Mr. Jones who is now 85 years old and in a retirement home for his weekly visit. That’s if he’s allowed in a retirement home to begin with.

Viewing 3 reply threads
Reply To: Report from the Bars, Barriers, or Justice Expo in West Chester, PA
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">